                
|
 |
 |

Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice
Executive Summary
The City of Charlottesville and the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission prepared this Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice as part of their commitment to "affirmatively furthering fair housing." The Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice is a companion document to the Consolidated Plan and seeks to illustrate the current fair housing profile of the area, identify impediments to fair housing choice, describe current public and private fair housing programs in the region, and make recommendations to overcome the stated barriers.
Impediments to fair housing choice are defined as any actions, omissions, or decisions taken because of race, color, religion, sex, disability, familial status or national origin that restrict housing choices or the availability of housing choice, or any actions, omissions or decisions that have this effect.
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice for all recipients of HOME and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. The member governments of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District (Counties of Albemarle, Fluvanna, Greene, Louisa and Nelson, and the City of Charlottesville) entered into an agreement to participate in the HOME Program as a Consortium, and, therefore receive annual entitlement HOME funds available on an equal share basis available to each participating government. The City of Charlottesville has been designated the lead agency for the HOME Consortium and the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission the designated Program Manager for the Consortium. The City of Charlottesville is a CDBG entitlement community and receives annual CDBG funds to be used within the City.
The fair housing and discrimination issues identified in this document can be summarized as follows:
- African Americans and people of Hispanic or Latino origin in the region have a much higher likelihood of being extremely low income than the population as a whole. Thirty-nine percent (39%) of black households and 35% of Hispanic households fall below 50% of the median family income, compared to 23% of all households.
- The shortage of affordable housing is still a severe problem for many low income residents in the Planning District. A worker earning minimum wage ($5.15 per hour) must work 104 hours a week to afford a 2 bedroom apartment at fair market rent in Albemarle, Charlottesville, Fluvanna, and Greene, 74 hours a week in Louisa, and 68 hours a week in Nelson County.
- HOME, Inc. performed testing in the Charlottesville area for accessibility for people with disabilities, and found that 100% of the sites did not meet fair housing accessibility guidelines. New building codes in the City seek to redress these deficiencies.
- According to the Jefferson Area Disability Services Board, affordability is as much of a problem for people with disabilities as accessibility.
- Piedmont Housing Alliance received 50 fair housing complaints or questions between January 2002 and November 2003. Issues included race, national origin, religion, gender, family status, and disability.
- At almost all income levels, African Americans are denied loans at a greater rate than whites of the same income level. Both white and black applicants are most often denied loans based upon credit history and debt-to-income ratio. (Source: 2002 HMDA Data)
- Many people are choosing housing in areas further from the urban center. As individuals move further from the central area, this affects their access to available services and employment centers, and puts a greater strain on regional transportation networks.
Based upon the results of the Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing Choice, the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission and the City of Charlottesville identified the following impediments and recommends the following actions to address those impediments.
Affordability
Significant housing cost burden for low and moderate income families; Lack of affordable units.
| Objective |
Measurable Result |
Responsible Parties |
Time Frame for Completion |
| Make existing housing more affordable; Incr. supply of affordable units; Decr. % of people with severe cost burden |
Smaller % of people w severe cost burden; # of people receiving assistance; # of affordable units |
HOME Consortium, local governments, non-profit organizations |
Ongoing |
Accessibility:
Lack of awareness about accessibility requirements; Shortage of accessible units
| Objective |
Measurable Result |
Responsible Parties |
Time Frame for Completion |
| Raise awareness of fair housing laws;Incr # of access. units; Resources for people w disabilities; Incr. # of accessible units |
Number of people reached through outreach efforts; Availability of resources for people w disabilities; # of accessible units |
Piedmont Housing Alliance, Independence Resource Center, local governments |
Ongoing |
Lending:
Disparity in loan applications and approval rates by race
| Objective |
Measurable Result |
Responsible Parties |
Time Frame for Completion |
| Achieve equity in lending; Raise awareness about financial literacy, homebuyer counseling, and predatory lending; Affirmative mkting |
Number of people reached through trainings; Results of future HMDA data; Level of outreach |
Piedmont Housing Alliance, other non-profit organizations,local governments |
PHA's predatory lending training will began in Jan 2004; other activities are ongoing |
Growth Patterns:
Movement of low income families out of urban areas
| Objective |
Measurable Result |
Responsible Parties |
Time Frame for Completion |
| Encourage greater integration of neighborhoods; Support mixed income/mixed use; Integrated transportation sys |
More integrated neighborhoods; Development of mixed income, mixed use neighborhoods |
Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission, local governments, non-profit orgs |
Ongoing |
Community Resistance:
Stigma attached to affordable housing.
| Objective |
Measurable Result |
Responsible Parties |
Time Frame for Completion |
| Dissipate community resistance; Improve image of affordable housing; Seek additional funding for special needs populations |
Results of Housing Virginia pre- and post- campaign surveys; Improve design in aff. hous.; Funding for special needs populations |
Local governments, HOME Consortium, non-profit organizations, Housing Virginia |
Beginning Spring/Summer 2004; Ongoing |
Discrimination:
Discrimination based on race, national origin, family status, gender, and disability in housing; Lack of awareness about fair housing laws.
| Objective |
Measurable Result |
Responsible Parties |
Time Frame for Completion |
| Eliminate discrimination in housing; Raise awareness about fair housing laws; Provide counseling and follow-up |
# of people reached w articles, trainings, etc; # of complaints; results from testing (if conducted) |
Piedmont Housing Alliance, local gov, HOME Consortium, and other non-profit organizations |
Ongoing |
|
 |

 | The following are sections of the original PDF document divided for faster download. They require the Adobe Acrobat Reader. |  | | Get Acrobat Reader |  |
|